Notícias de mercado & insights
Mantenha-se à frente dos mercados com insights de especialistas, notícias e análise técnica para orientar suas decisões de negociação.

O mercado de petróleo tem o hábito de parecer estável logo antes de parar de ser liquidado. Essa é a configuração agora.
O tráfego pelo Estreito de Ormuz caiu drasticamente à medida que o conflito em torno do Irã se intensificou, e mais embarcações estão escurecendo ao desligar o AIS, ou Sistema de Identificação Automática, sinais que geralmente mostram para onde os navios estão se movendo. Ormuz não é apenas mais uma rota marítima. É um dos pontos de estrangulamento energéticos mais importantes do mundo; portanto, quando a visibilidade começa a desaparecer, o risco de fornecimento volta ao centro da conversa.
Por que isso importa agora
Isso é importante por alguns motivos.
A mudança da manchete é uma coisa. A implicação do mercado é outra. O petróleo não se trata apenas de quantos barris existem, mas também de saber se esses barris podem se mover, quem está disposto a segurá-los, quanto tempo os compradores estão preparados para esperar e quanto risco extra os comerciantes acham que precisam precificá-los.
No momento, três coisas estão colidindo ao mesmo tempo: navegação interrompida, diplomacia frágil e um mercado que já está fortemente inclinado em uma direção. Essa combinação pode fazer com que o Brent se mova mais rápido do que os fundamentos normalmente sugerem.
O que está impulsionando a mudança
1 A visibilidade do fornecimento está se deteriorando
O primeiro driver é simples. O mercado pode ver menos, e isso tende a deixá-lo mais nervoso.
O trânsito por Ormuz caiu drasticamente, enquanto uma parcela crescente do tráfego envolveu navios que não estão mais transmitindo sinais de rastreamento padrão. Em linguagem simples, menos embarcações estão se movendo normalmente por um corredor crítico e mais atividades estão se tornando mais difíceis de rastrear. Isso não significa automaticamente que o fornecimento está prestes a entrar em colapso. Mas isso significa que a incerteza está aumentando.
2 O buffer de armazenamento do Irã pode ser limitado
O segundo fator é a restrição de exportação e armazenamento do Irã.
A capacidade de armazenamento terrestre é estimada em cerca de 40 milhões de barris, e o mercado está observando o que alguns descrevem como uma linha vermelha de 16 dias. Esse é o ponto em que uma interrupção prolongada nas exportações pode começar a forçar cortes na produção para evitar danos aos reservatórios. Para leitores mais novos, a conclusão é simples. Se o petróleo não puder deixar o armazenamento por tempo suficiente, o problema pode deixar de ser o atraso nas exportações e começar a se tornar um problema genuíno de abastecimento.
3 O posicionamento pode amplificar o movimento
O terceiro fator é o posicionamento, que é apenas uma abreviação do mercado de como os negociadores já estão configurados antes que o próximo movimento aconteça.
Nesse caso, o posicionamento especulativo do petróleo bruto parece fortemente unilateral. Isso é importante porque, quando um mercado está muito inclinado em uma direção, não é preciso muito para desencadear um ajuste brusco. Um novo choque geopolítico pode forçar os comerciantes a agir rapidamente e, uma vez que isso comece, o preço pode subir mais do que as notícias subjacentes por si só poderiam justificar.
Por que o mercado se importa
Um choque de petróleo raramente permanece contido no mercado de energia.
Os preços mais altos do petróleo bruto podem começar a aparecer nas contas de frete, manufatura e energia doméstica. Isso significa que as expectativas de inflação podem começar a subir novamente. Os bancos centrais já estão tentando administrar um equilíbrio difícil entre inflação estável e crescimento mais fraco, então o aumento do petróleo pode dificultar esse trabalho.
E essa não é apenas uma história sobre produtores de petróleo recebendo carona. Companhias aéreas, empresas de transporte e outras empresas sensíveis ao combustível podem ser rapidamente pressionadas quando os custos de energia aumentam. Mercados acionários mais amplos também podem ter que repensar as perspectivas políticas se o petróleo mais alto mantiver a inflação mais firme do que o esperado.
Os efeitos em cascata vão muito além do petróleo.
Há também um ângulo monetário, e é menos simples do que parece à primeira vista.
Moedas vinculadas a commodities, como o dólar australiano, geralmente recebem apoio quando os preços das matérias-primas sobem. Mas essa relação não é automática. Se o petróleo está subindo porque a demanda global está melhorando, isso pode ajudar. Se estiver subindo porque o risco geopolítico está aumentando, os mercados podem passar para o modo de isenção de risco, e isso pode pesar sobre o dólar australiano, mesmo com o aumento dos preços das commodities.
É isso que torna esse tipo de movimento mais interessante do que parece à primeira vista. A mesma alta do petróleo pode apoiar uma parte do mercado e pressionar outra.
Ativos e nomes no quadro
O petróleo Brent continua sendo a leitura mais clara sobre o amplo risco de oferta. Se os traders desejam a expressão mais limpa da manchete, geralmente é aqui que eles olham primeiro.
- ExxonMobil é um dos nomes mais óbvios no quadro. Os preços mais altos do petróleo podem apoiar os preços de venda realizados e a dinâmica dos lucros de curto prazo, embora nunca seja tão simples quanto comprar petróleo, estocar. Custos, mix de produção e sentimentos mais amplos ainda são importantes.
- NextEra Energy adiciona outra camada. Essa história não é apenas sobre combustíveis fósseis. Quando a segurança energética se torna uma preocupação maior, o argumento a favor da resiliência energética doméstica, do investimento na rede e da geração alternativa também pode se fortalecer.
- AUD/USD é outro mercado que vale a pena observar. A Austrália está intimamente ligada aos ciclos de commodities, portanto, preços mais fortes das matérias-primas às vezes podem sustentar a moeda. Mas se os mercados estão reagindo mais ao medo do que ao crescimento, esse vento favorável usual pode não se manter.
Para leitores mais novos, o ponto principal é que os movimentos do petróleo não se espalham pelos mercados em uma linha clara e previsível. Eles se espalham de forma desigual, ajudando alguns ativos, pressionando outros e, às vezes, fazendo as duas coisas ao mesmo tempo.
O que poderia dar errado
Uma narrativa forte não é o mesmo que uma negociação unidirecional.
Um cessar-fogo poderia estabilizar os fluxos marítimos mais rápido do que o esperado. A OPEP+ poderia compensar parte da rigidez elevando a produção. Os dados de demanda da China podem decepcionar, voltando o foco para o consumo fraco, em vez da oferta restrita. E se o prêmio geopolítico diminuir, o petróleo poderá recuar mais rapidamente do que sugere o clima atual.
Para leitores mais novos, a conclusão é simples. Os ralis do petróleo podem ser reais sem serem permanentes. Uma mudança pode ser justificada no curto prazo pelo risco de interrupção e, em seguida, reverter rapidamente se esses riscos diminuírem ou se a demanda diminuir.
O mercado não está mais precificando o petróleo isoladamente. É a visibilidade dos preços, a segurança do transporte e o risco de que a interrupção do fornecimento se espalhe pela inflação, pelas moedas e por um sentimento de risco mais amplo.
É por isso que Ormuz é importante, mesmo para leitores que nunca negociam um barril de petróleo bruto.

Markets are rattled by US- North Korea tensions as Trump vows to respond to North Korea nuclear threats with “fire and furry”. The senior administration officials and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson tried to find different ways to explain the President’s comments and play down the tough talk. Trump reinforced his threats stating “they should be very nervous, because things will happen to them like they never thought possible”.
The standoff has unsettled the financial markets worldwide. The DOW dropped by 200 pips and S&P 500 fell to sessions lows. The CBOE Volatility Index, the best gauge of fear in the market spiked by 45%. [caption id="attachment_58085" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Source: GO Markets MT4[/caption] The demand for safe havens has increased with the rising tensions.
Investors have switched to gold, yen, swiss franc and government bonds. USDJPY dropped to record low and Gold rose to its highest level in almost 2 months.. [caption id="attachment_58086" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Source: GO Markets MT4[/caption] The risk sentiment gets hit by the escalating geopolitical tensions as Japan and South Korea also warned of a strong response if North Korea launches missiles toward Guam. Trump intensifies its warnings to North Korea as he believes that even if Russia and China are backing the UN sanctions, it would not be enough or effective as negotiations have been going on for years.
The Nikkei index fell since the “war of words” started. [caption id="attachment_58087" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Source: GO Markets MT4[/caption] Chinese media warn that the US is engaging in dangerous confrontations. “The US is more powerful than North Korea, but in a real showdown I don’t think they would beat North Korea. There is a Chinese saying: ‘ A man with nothing to lose, doesn’t fear a man with something to lose ” Hu Xijin, outspoken editor of the Global Times said. The coming days will be crucial.
Investors will be looking for a “diplomatic outcome” rather than militaristic conflict. By: Deepta Bolaky GO Markets

In Economics, the difference between 10 Year and 2 Year Bond Yields is one of the leading indicators that help investors to observe any significant changes in the economy. Let's break things down a little further. Firstly, common sense dictates that if you want to make a term deposit in the bank, the rate you can get from the long-term deposit will be more than short term.
Therefore, the spread between long-term and short-term return rate should always be positive, well, in most of the time. However in some historical periods, sometimes the yield spread would be “flatted” (i.e., drop close to zero) or even become negative, in some extreme cases. If that happens, where short-term returns are higher than long-term returns, this is seen as an economic overheat, and a recession is coming.
From the chart below, we can see that the current yield spread is heading towards zero. Since the Fed is guaranteed to have four rate hikes in 2018, and more increases are foreseeable in 2019, the spread is very likely to go negative sooner or later. We'll take a look that the previous cases of the inverted yield curve (i.e., negative yield spread) 1. 2000’s Dotcom Bubble The US Federal Reserve increased its interest rate from 4.75% to 6.5% in a brief time, between Jun 1999 to May 2000, which makes short-term yield soar rapidly and inverted yield curve occurred.
After the NASDAQ bubble burst, the Fed dropped its rates thirteen times in two years, to save its economy. 2. 2008’s Subprime Crisis The same story happened all over again, the Fed first increased its rates 17 times, from 1% to 5.25%. At that time whole world’s economy reached its peak, there is a 6-7% average GDP growth in emerging markets, and even in advanced countries there is a 2.5% growth (which is a lot, compared with today’s growth in the UK) However soon after the crisis triggered, the Fed dropped its rates from 5.25% to 0.00% in only one-year time and kept its zero-rate environment for almost a decade. From the two lessons above, we can observe a similar pattern.
Inverted yield curves consistently occurred near the end of the rate hike cycle, and a substantial economic recession would generally follow. Currently, the US is in the middle of its rate hike cycle, and it seems many of the economic data reveals a sign of overheat. Take the unemployment rate as an example, last month it fell to 3.9%, which is an 18-year low.
The performance of new jobs number is in one of the best periods of growths in recent history. Although previous activity doesn't necessarily predict future outcomes, history suggests once these figures reach their highest possible level, a turning point could be around the corner. There is a saying that lightning never strikes twice, we shall see in this case.
Lanson Chen GO Markets Analyst This article is written by a GO Markets Analyst and is based on their independent analysis. They remain fully responsible for the views expressed as well as any remaining error or omissions. Trading Forex and Derivatives carries a high level of risk.
Sources: TradeEconomics.com

Venezuela: A Latin American Crisis Venezuela’s economy has been in turmoil in recent times with its inflation skyrocketing and with no signs of slowing down, the situation may worsen. The political tensions have also been rising in one of the OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) member country whose economy has been slowly declining since the crash of oil prices in 2014. We have seen large protests against the highly unpopular president Nicolas Maduro, who won the most recent in May this year.
However, most people called it a "show election" as it had the lowest voter turnout in Venezuela’s democratic history at 46%. The Economy With the economic and social crisis rising in Venezuela, we have seen the countries inflation rise to new record highs. From reaching 4068% in January, we have seen the inflation reach 46305% last month.
Experts are predicting the number could reach 1,000,000% by the end of 2018, according to the IMF (International Monetary Fund) economist Alejandro Werner and has compared it to Zimbabwe’s hyperinflation in late 2000’s. It is worth pointing out that the second highest inflation in the world is in Sudan at 122%. Shortages in electricity, water, and public transport affect millions of people of Venezuela.
President Maduro blames countries poor economy on an economic war that he says is being led by the United States and Europe. IMF’s Alejandro Werner says that if the country’s economic and social crisis deepens, Venezuela’s economy could decrease by around 50% over the next 5 years which be one of the worst economic falls in over 60 years. "The collapse in economic activity, hyperinflation, and increasing deterioration... will lead to intensifying spillover effects on neighbouring countries," Werner wrote in a blog post. IMF is estimating an 18% decrease in Venezuela’s economy in 2018, up from 15% drop it predicted back in April.
That would be the third double-digit annual decline in a row. Werner said the projections are based on calculations prepared by IMF staff, but he warned that they have a degree of uncertainty greater than in other countries. "An economy throwing you these numbers is very difficult to project," Werner said at a news conference. "Any changes between now and December may include significant changes." The Venezuelan Currency Countries official currency - Bolivar Fuerte (VEF) has weakened dramatically in recent times. 1 US Dollar is currently worth around 206841 bolivars. The Venezuelan government has recently announced it will slash five zeros from its currency.
The announcement was made on 25th July by President Maduro and it is part of a currency reform that was already scheduled for June and was a postponed on two occasions before. The existing Bolivar Fuerte banknotes, which range from 1,000 to 100,000 will stop circulating and will be replaced by the new "bolivar Soberano", which will range from 2 to 500. The new currency is set to start circulating this month.
By Klāvs Valters Sources: Yahoo Finance, Google Maps, Banco Central De Venezuela

GO Markets Pty Ltd updated its Product Disclosure Statement (PDS). View our updated Product Disclosure Statement. The changes made to the PDS mainly relate to adding share CFDs to our offer.
Please read and save a copy of this document for your records.

The fourth quarter kicked off with some good news on trade with a last-minute agreement between US-Mexico- Canada just before the deadline. "America first" is the slogan by Trump and he managed to do just that at least when renaming NAFTA to USMCA. The new agreement came with rules for cars and trucks, labour, IP protections and dairy products. After more than a year of tumultuous negotiations, Trump revamped the nearly 25-year old deal.
Markets participants cheered a “Non-Disaster” scenario but continue to be wary of trade tensions. Investors welcomed the trilateral agreement and eliminated the downside risks of a trade war in this part of the hemisphere. Canada and Mexico are the United States’ two biggest export markets.
The largest exports are the automobiles and auto parts while the largest import with Canada is crude oil and gas. *(Data are goods only) While there are a few tweaks, or changes to the new agreement, the dairy and automobile industry emerged as the two main factors that helped all parties to revamp the trilateral agreement. Dairy Industry The dairy industry appears to be the deal maker even though this sector represents a negligible percentage. Canada is not a significant exporter or importer of dairy products, but its supply management system helps them to control their dairy sector and protect their farmers’ income by limiting imports and setting quotas on domestic production.
The US is facing a severe milk glut, and the US farmers are suffering heavy losses. The new deal gives American farmers greater access to the dairy industry in Canada worth 3.6%. The removal of the controversial Class 7 which is a domestic pricing class that governs milk ingredients such as skim milk powder and milk protein is “a win” for the Americans, Australians and New Zealanders.
They have insisted that this new pricing class has effectively pushed them out of the Canadian dairy markets and this was even challenged at the World Trade Organisation. However, some analysts are sceptical of whether this win on Canada opening up its dairy industry will solve the oversupply of milk in the US. Automobile Industry The agreement will reportedly benefit the car-manufacturing workers in all three countries. 75% of the parts that go into a vehicle is required to be made in North America to qualify for tariff-free, and it also requires 40-45% of a car be made by workers earning at least $16 an hour.
The reaction of the markets The deal brought a relief rally in the markets, but investors are aware that the US-China trade dispute is a much bigger issue. The US has a trade deficit of $71bn with Mexico and $18bn with Canada for goods transactions, and it took more than a year of negotiations for the trilateral agreement to be revised. China has a whopping $375.2bn trade deficit with the US and investors are aware that talks will be challenging.
The Asian markets will probably remain vulnerable to the tit-for-tat trade spat between the US and China. The European markets were able to build up the upbeat momentum on the USMCA as Brexit noises, and Italian risks weighed on markets’ sentiments. Investors are reluctant to put their money in those markets when the US stocks are more attractive given that its fundamentals are stronger.
USDCAD fell sharply to 1.2780 before rebounding and consolidating at the 1.2800 level. A lack of fundamental drivers is restricting the pair to make a firm move in a direction. On the technical side, the RSI remains above the 30 mark which is the oversold conditions which may signal that the pair could drop further down before making any correction.
Is it a “win” for Trump? At first glance, it looks like a victory, but the concessions are mostly similar to the TPP, so it is more good news for Canada. It is argued whether the damage done to the relationship was worth it.
Unlike China, Canada was a good ally to the US. Trade tensions are not over as US-China, US-Japan, US-Europe trade talks are still pending.

US Trade vs the World Since Donald Trump became the President of the United States in 2016, we have heard him say a lot about the "unbelievably bad" trade agreements the world’s largest economy has with some countries around the world. We have already seen Trump attempt to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which has reached a deadlock, and there is a possibility of the US scrapping the decades-old agreement between Canada and Mexico. But how does the trade balance look between the US and other nations around the world?
Trade Surplus President Trump has said that "We don't have any good deals. In fact, I'm trying to find a country where we actually have a surplus of trade as opposed to... Everything's a deficit." However, there are many countries which the US has a positive trade balance with.
It’s largest trade surplus is with Hong Kong at $29.7 billion, followed by the Netherlands. The US exports reached nearly $37 billion with Hong Kong in 2017 (from January to November) with $6.9 billion worth of goods imported. However, some analysts are suggesting that Hong Kong’s trade with the US will suffer from the ongoing tensions between the two largest economies in the world.
Trade Deficit Trump has aimed some strong words towards the countries which the US has a negative trade balance with. Most of the criticism has been towards the trading relationship with China – the world’s second largest economy. He may have a point as the trade deficit stands at a whopping $344.4 billion (year-to-date).
Trump said – "With China we have close to a $500 billion trade deficit, so we have to do something. I spoke to the president, I spoke to many people — we're going to work on that very, very hard. And we're going to do things that are the proper things to do." The second largest trade deficit is with one of Americas two closest neighbours – Mexico.
Donald Trump has slated the NAFTA agreement in particular, which he has called a disaster for US manufacturing. However, since Trump was elected we have seen some big American companies move their production back to the US. Most recently Fiat Chrysler, the world’s eighth largest auto maker announced its plans to move production of its Ram heavy pickup trucks from Mexico to Michigan.
Moving production of the Ram, which is mainly sold in the US and Canada, means that Fiat Chrysler will not be paying the high import duties which are likely to apply if the NAFTA agreement is rolled back. Overall, we can see why Trump has been criticising the trading agreements with some countries around the world. But will he be able to change it during his presidency?
His current actions would suggest that the United States’ trade policies will be changing.
