Pfizer Inc. (PFE) reported its Q2 financial results before the market open in the US on Thursday. World’s third largest pharmaceutical company topped both revenue and earnings per share estimates for the quarter. The company reported revenue of $27.742 billion in Q2 (up 47% year-over-year) vs. $25.487 billion expected.
Earnings per share reported at $2.04 per share (up by 92% year-over-year) vs. $1.72 per share estimate. Dr. Albert Bourla, Chairman and CEO commented on the latest results: ''In multiple meaningful ways, we made significant progress this quarter on our strategies to bring value to our patients and shareholders, while also making commitments to prioritize the broader needs of the world, including those of the environment and our most vulnerable populations.
For example, we set an ambitious goal for ourselves to achieve the Net-Zero Standard for greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, ten years ahead of the timeline described in the standard. We also launched an initiative to help bring all of our current and future patented medicines and vaccines to the 1.2 billion people living in 45 lower-income countries around the world at not-for-profit prices, a first in the industry.'' ''Even while launching these initiatives to support a healthier, more equitable world, we remain equally committed to strong financial execution on behalf of our shareholders. In the second quarter, we recorded the largest amount of quarterly sales in our history.
We also presented potentially best-in-class data for etrasimod and announced the proposed strategic acquisition of Biohaven, both of which are closely tied to our purpose: Breakthroughs that change patients’ lives,'' Dr. Bourla concluded. Pfizer Inc. (PFE) chart Despite beating Wall Street expectations for Q2, shares of Pfizer were down by around 1% at $50.98 per share.
Here is how the stock has performed in the past year: 1 Month -2.82% 3 Month +0.87% Year-to-date -13.72% 1 Year +19.07% Pfizer price targets Morgan Stanley $49 Wells Fargo $55 Citigroup $57 B of A Securities $70 Goldman Sachs $51 Pfizer Inc. is the 27 th largest company in the world with a market cap of $285.76 billion. You can trade Pfizer Inc. (PFE) and many other stocks from the NYSE, NASDAQ, HKEX and the ASX with GO Markets as a Share CFD. Sources: Pfizer Inc., TradingView, MetaTrader 5, Benzinga, CompaniesMarketCap
By
Klavs Valters
Account Manager, GO Markets London.
The information provided is of general nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situations or needs. Before acting on any information provided, you should consider whether the information is suitable for you and your personal circumstances and if necessary, seek appropriate professional advice. All opinions, conclusions, forecasts or recommendations are reasonably held at the time of compilation but are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not an indication of future performance. Go Markets Pty Ltd, ABN 85 081 864 039, AFSL 254963 is a CFD issuer, and trading carries significant risks and is not suitable for everyone. You do not own or have any interest in the rights to the underlying assets. You should consider the appropriateness by reviewing our TMD, FSG, PDS and other CFD legal documents to ensure you understand the risks before you invest in CFDs.
Saham pertahanan ASX kembali ke daftar pantauan dan menurut Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), pengeluaran militer global mencapai sekitar US$2,718 triliun pada 2024, naik 9,4% secara riil.
Pengaturan pertahanan Australia saat ini ditetapkan dalam Strategi Pertahanan Nasional 2024 dan dokumen perencanaan investasi terkait, yang menguraikan prioritas pendanaan kemampuan jangka panjang. Selain itu, Canberra telah menunjuk investasi kemampuan A$330 miliar hingga 2034, termasuk dana tambahan untuk kombatan permukaan, kesiapsiagaan, serangan jarak jauh dan sistem otonom.
Inilah bagian yang kebanyakan orang lewatkan: tidak semua saham pertahanan ASX adalah perdagangan yang sama. Beberapa duduk dekat dengan pembuatan kapal angkatan laut. Beberapa adalah nama kontra-drone dan beberapa adalah operator yang lebih kecil dan berisiko lebih tinggi di mana satu kontrak mungkin jauh lebih penting daripada yang diasumsikan pasar.
Kelima nama ini bukan daftar beli, melainkan daftar pantauan praktis bagi investor yang mencoba memahami di mana momentum pengadaan sebenarnya muncul di ASX.
1) Australia (ASX: ASB)
Austal adalah salah satu perusahaan yang terdaftar di ASX yang paling langsung terkena pipa pembuatan kapal angkatan laut Australia, meskipun pelaksanaan kontrak, margin, dan waktu pengiriman tetap menjadi variabel penting.
Mereka tidak hanya memenangkan kontrak acak; mereka telah menandatangani perjanjian hukum besar-besaran (Perjanjian Pembuatan Kapal Strategis) yang menjadikan mereka mitra resmi untuk membangun generasi berikutnya kapal militer menengah Australia di Australia Barat.
Pada Februari 2026, pemerintah memberi Austal lampu hijau pada proyek senilai $4 miliar. Ini bukan hanya untuk satu kapal, ini untuk 8 kapal “Landing Craft Heavy”. Ini adalah kapal pengangkut besar (panjang sekitar 100 meter) yang dirancang untuk membawa tank berat dan peralatan langsung ke pantai. Tapi inilah bagian yang kebanyakan orang lewatkan, pembuatan kapal adalah maraton, bukan sprint.
Seperti yang Anda lihat di garis waktu pengiriman, sementara konstruksi dimulai pada tahun 2026, kapal terakhir tidak akan dikirim sampai 2038. Bagi seorang investor, ini berarti Austal memiliki aliran pendapatan “terjamin” selama 12 tahun ke depan, tetapi mereka harus sangat pandai mengelola biaya mereka selama periode yang lama untuk benar-benar menghasilkan keuntungan.
2) DroneShield (ASX: DRO)
Jika Anda telah melihat rekaman drone kecil yang mengganggu medan perang modern, DroneShield sedang membangun bagian dari “sakelar mati”. Fokusnya adalah teknologi kontra-drone, termasuk sistem yang mendeteksi, mengganggu atau mengalahkan drone menggunakan perang elektronik, sensor, dan alat yang dipimpin perangkat lunak, daripada hanya mengandalkan amunisi tradisional.
Pada awal 2026, DroneShield telah bergerak melampaui label start-up yang menjanjikan dan ke fase komersial yang jauh lebih besar. Ini melaporkan pendapatan FY2025 sebesar A $216.5 juta, naik 276% dari FY2024, dan mengatakan memulai FY2026 dengan pendapatan berkomitmen A $103.5 juta.
Satu hal yang mungkin diabaikan pasar adalah lapisan perangkat lunak dalam model. DroneShield melaporkan pendapatan Software as a Service (SaaS) sebesar A$11.6 juta pada FY2025 dan mengatakan sedang bekerja menuju SaaS yang menghasilkan 30% dari pendapatan dalam lima tahun. Model berlangganannya mencakup pembaruan perangkat lunak untuk sistem yang digunakan, yang menambahkan aliran pendapatan berulang yang berkembang di samping penjualan perangkat keras.
Di antara saham pertahanan ASX, DroneShield adalah salah satu cara paling langsung untuk mengikuti tema Counter-UAS. Ini juga salah satu nama di mana sentimen dapat berayun dengan cepat, karena cerita pertumbuhan dapat berubah kembali ke atas dan ke bawah ketika waktu pesanan berubah.
EOS membangun “otak” dan “otot” untuk platform militer. Hal ini terkenal karena sistem senjata jarak jauh, yang memungkinkan operator untuk mengontrol menara bersenjata dari dalam kendaraan yang dilindungi, dan untuk sistem laser berenergi tinggi yang ditujukan untuk pertahanan kontra-drone. EOS mengatakan backlog tanpa syarat mencapai sekitar A$459,1 juta pada awal 2026, menyusul serangkaian kemenangan kontrak hingga 2025. Itu menunjukkan basis pekerjaan yang aman yang jauh lebih besar, meskipun waktu pengiriman dan konversi pendapatan masih penting.
EOS menandatangani kontrak senilai €71,4 juta, sekitar A$125 juta, dengan pelanggan Eropa untuk sistem senjata laser energi tinggi 100 kilowatt. EOS mengatakan sistem ini dirancang untuk biaya rendah per bidikan dan dapat melibatkan hingga 20 drone per menit. Pemerintah Australia telah menyisihkan 1,3 miliar dolar Australia selama 10 tahun untuk akuisisi kemampuan kontra-drone, dan EOS telah mengungkapkan bahwa mereka adalah bagian dari tim tawaran LAND 156 yang sukses. Itu tidak menjamin pendapatan di masa depan, tetapi mendukung visibilitas jangka menengah di pasar yang sudah ditargetkan perusahaan.
EOS dibaca sebagai cerita rebound, tetapi yang masih bergantung pada eksekusi. Perusahaan telah berorientasi ulang di sekitar sistem senjata jarak jauh, sistem kontra-drone dan laser, semua area terkait dengan pengeluaran pertahanan yang lebih kuat. Pertanyaan kuncinya adalah apakah ia dapat terus mengubah backlog dan pipeline menjadi pendapatan yang disampaikan sambil mempertahankan disiplin neraca.
4) Kode (ASX: CDA)
Codan terkadang ditinggalkan dari daftar saham pertahanan biasa karena lebih beragam. Itu mungkin kekeliruan. Dalam hasil H1 FY26, Codan mengatakan bisnis Komunikasi merancang komunikasi penting untuk pasar keamanan militer dan publik global. Pendapatan komunikasi naik 19% menjadi A $221,8 juta. Perusahaan juga mengatakan DTC menghasilkan pertumbuhan yang kuat dari permintaan pertahanan dan sistem tak berawak, dengan pendapatan sistem tak berawak naik 68% menjadi A$73 juta. Codan mengatakan sekitar setengah dari pendapatan tak berawak itu terkait dengan aplikasi pertahanan operasional di zona konflik.
Di sinilah cerita menjadi lebih bernuansa. Dalam sekeranjang saham pertahanan ASX, Codan dapat menawarkan profil yang berbeda, dengan sensitivitas judul yang kurang murni, diversifikasi operasi yang lebih luas dan paparan yang berarti terhadap komunikasi militer dan sistem tak berawak tanpa menjadi nama tema tunggal. Diversifikasi itu juga dapat berarti saham tidak selalu diperdagangkan seperti nama pertahanan murni.
HighCom berada di akhir spekulatif daftar ini, dan harus diberi label seperti itu. Perusahaan mengatakan dua bisnisnya yang berkelanjutan adalah HighCom Armor, yang memasok perlindungan balistik, dan HighCom Technology, yang memasok dan memelihara sistem udara kecil dan menengah tanpa awak, sistem udara tanpa awak, dan rekayasa terkait, integrasi, pemeliharaan dan dukungan logistik untuk ADF dan militer regional yang selaras lainnya.
Di H1 FY26, pendapatan dari operasi berkelanjutan turun 59% menjadi A $10,9 juta, sementara EBITDA bergerak ke kerugian A $5.4 juta dari laba A$1.9 juta tahun sebelumnya. HighCom juga mengungkapkan pendapatan A$5,1 juta dalam HighCom Technology, termasuk A$3,5 juta dari suku cadang sistem udara kecil tanpa awak (SUAS) dan A $1,6 juta dari layanan keberlanjutan yang diberikan kepada Departemen Pertahanan Australia.
Jadi ya, HighCom adalah salah satu saham pertahanan ASX yang lebih sensitif secara finansial di dewan direksi. Tapi itu juga jenis nama yang lebih kecil yang dapat menunjukkan bagaimana pengadaan menyaring ke dalam peralatan pendukung, keberlanjutan, dan perlindungan spesialis.
Pengamatan pasar utama
Lacak tonggak program, bukan hanya berita utama politik. Penghargaan kontrak, produksi dimulai, jadwal pengiriman, dan pekerjaan pemeliharaan sering kali lebih penting dari satu hari pengumuman.
Pisahkan eksposur permainan murni dari eksposur yang beragam. DroneShield dan EOS lebih dekat dengan tema teknologi pertahanan terkonsentrasi, sementara Codan membawa paparan komunikasi dalam bauran bisnis yang lebih luas.
Tonton tema kemampuan kedaulatan di Australia. Austal dan EOS terkait dengan manufaktur lokal, integrasi, dan rantai pasokan Australia, yang mendukung tema kemampuan kedaulatan yang lebih luas dalam grup ini.
Perhatikan neraca dan konversi tunai. Momentum pengadaan bisa menjadi nyata bahkan ketika waktu menjadi berantakan. Setengah terakhir HighCom adalah pengingat akan hal itu.
Berita utama pertahanan bisa terlihat langsung. Penghasilan biasanya tidak. Pekerjaan angkatan laut utama Austal membentang hingga dekade berikutnya. Kontrak EOS dikirimkan selama beberapa tahun. Aliran pesanan DroneShield tampak kuat, tetapi perusahaan masih memisahkan pendapatan berkomitmen dari peluang pipeline yang lebih luas. HighCom menunjukkan sisi lain dari koin. Paparan pengadaan tidak secara otomatis diterjemahkan ke dalam eksekusi keuangan yang lancar.
Referensi ke saham pertahanan yang terdaftar di ASX hanya informasi umum, bukan rekomendasi untuk membeli, menjual, atau memegang sekuritas atau CFD apa pun. Saham-saham ini bisa sangat fluktuatif dan sensitif terhadap waktu kontrak, kebijakan pemerintah, geopolitik, risiko eksekusi, dan kondisi pasar. Backlog, pipeline, dan ekspektasi pendapatan bukanlah jaminan kinerja masa depan.
Siap untuk berdagang di luar mata uang utama? Buka akun · Masuk
Pada tanggal 28 Februari 2026, ketika serangan gabungan AS dan Israel dimulai, angka-angka di layar mulai bergerak dengan cara yang terasa klinis, bahkan ketika kenyataan di lapangan dengan kematian tragis korban sipil di Iran, terasa sama sekali tidak. Pasar, seperti yang mereka katakan, tidak memiliki kompas moral, melainkan mereka memiliki mesin penimbang dan saat ini, mereka menimbang transisi seluruh ekonomi global dari model “just-in-time” ke siklus “just-in-case”.
Pasar apa yang memberi sinyal
Pada 2 Maret, rekaman indeks tetap berhati-hati sementara pertahanan naik. Secara historis, konflik dapat mempercepat pengisian ulang dan pesanan tetapi seberapa besar (dan seberapa cepat) masih tergantung pada anggaran, persetujuan, dan hambatan pengiriman.
Para Pemenang
1. Hanwha Aerospace (012450.KS)
Hanwha adalah salah satu nama yang lebih aktif diperdagangkan terkait dengan tema “K-Defence”, pasar perusahaan yang semakin dipandang sebagai pemasok yang dapat diskalakan ke dalam siklus artileri dan amunisi global yang ketat. Kapasitas dan kredibilitas pengiriman.
Ketika pengisian menjadi mendesak, kemampuan untuk memproduksi dalam skala sering kali sama pentingnya dengan platform itu sendiri. Permintaan ekspor yang terkait dengan sistem seperti K9 Thunder dan Chunmoo telah memperkuat narasi aliran pesanan yang tahan lama bahkan ketika hasilnya masih bergantung pada anggaran, persetujuan, dan jadwal pengiriman.
Hal-hal penting yang dapat menggerakkan sentimen: pembaruan buku pesanan, irama produksi, dan pengumuman ekspor lanjutan.
2. Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Northrop beralih ke fokus karena investor meninjau kembali eksposur terhadap modernisasi strategis dan program besar yang berjalan lama. Pasar pertahanan yang sering dilihat sebagai misi kritis dapat bertahan di seluruh siklus. Ini kurang sekitar seperempat dan lebih tentang apakah momentum tetap stabil jika prioritas modernisasi tetap ada (dan apakah garis waktu bergeser jika tidak).
Variabel kunci yang dapat menggerakkan sentimen: Kecepatan pengadaan, waktu kontrak, dan bahasa pendanaan terkait program.
3. Perusahaan RTX (RTX)
RTX kembali ke pusat rekaman saat investor memberi harga siklus pengisian pencegat dan ekonomi pertahanan udara tempo tinggi. Penggeseran mahal dan ketika tingkat penggunaan meningkat, pemerintah biasanya harus mengisi kembali persediaan dan, dalam banyak kasus, mendanai ekspansi produksi yang dapat memperpanjang backlog dan meningkatkan visibilitas pendapatan.
Variabel kunci yang dapat menggerakkan sentimen: Pesanan pengisian ulang, indikator ekspansi manufaktur, dan throughput pengiriman.
4. Lockheed Martin (LMT)
Lockheed menarik perhatian ketika pasar berfokus pada permintaan pertahanan rudal dan pertanyaan yang dihadapi setiap meja pengadaan dalam lingkungan tempo tinggi: seberapa cepat inventaris dapat dibangun kembali? Jika pemanfaatan tetap tinggi, pemenang cenderung menjadi kontraktor yang paling tepat untuk meningkatkan produksi dan memberikan yang andal. Paparan pertahanan rudal Lockheed membuatnya tetap terkait erat dengan narasi pengisian ulang itu.
Variabel kunci yang dapat menggerakkan sentimen: sinyal ramp produksi, ekonomi unit, dan irama pesanan yang digerakkan oleh anggaran.
5. Sistem BAE (BAL)
Dengan backlog £83,6 miliar dan peran sentral dalam program kapal selam AUKUS, BAE beralih ke fokus karena bagian Eropa menandakan ambisi belanja pertahanan yang lebih tinggi. Saham naik 6,11% ke level tertinggi 52 minggu di tengah rotasi “risk-off”, dengan pedagang mengamati tonggak sejarah AUKUS dan pengadaan pertahanan udara dan rudal Eropa, termasuk “Sky Shield”.
Variabel kunci yang dapat menggerakkan sentimen: Katalis potensial adalah peningkatan yang jelas dalam pengeluaran Jerman yang mengangkat aliran pesanan di seluruh unit BAE Eropa, sementara risiko utama termasuk lonjakan tajam dalam imbal hasil emas Inggris, volatilitas pound sterling yang diperbarui, atau pengambilan keuntungan “ancaman perdamaian”.
800
The Losers: tidak setiap 'saham perang' naik
6. AeroVironment (AVAV)
AeroVironment melonjak 18% pada pembukaan sebelum jatuh 17% intraday setelah laporan bahwa Angkatan Luar Angkasa AS membuka kembali kontrak senilai US$1,4 miliar. Langkah ini menyoroti bagaimana proses pengadaan dan risiko kontrak dapat mendorong volatilitas, bahkan dalam lingkungan tematik yang mendukung.
7. Pertahanan Kratos (KTOS)
Kratos duduk di tema drone dan amunisi yang berkeliaran yang menarik perhatian saat konflik Timur Tengah meningkat. Saham masih terjual setelah pendapatan, menyoroti risiko sektor pertahanan umum. Kratos mengumumkan penawaran ekuitas lanjutan besar dalam kisaran US$1,2 miliar hingga US$1,4 miliar, langkah ini memperkuat neraca dan dapat mendukung investasi program masa depan.
Untuk pedagang yang berfokus pada narasi “premium konflik” jangka pendek, pengenceran dapat dengan cepat mengubah pengaturan. Bahkan ketika kondisi permintaan tampak mendukung, pasar dapat harga kembali saham jika setiap pemegang saham pada akhirnya memiliki porsi bisnis yang lebih kecil.
8. Mesin Intuitif (LUNR)
Beberapa nama teknologi ruang angkasa spekulatif tertinggal karena investor tampaknya menyukai perusahaan dengan pendapatan terkait pertahanan yang lebih mapan.
9. Boeing (BA)
Boeing turun sekitar 2,5% pada sesi tersebut. Sementara divisi pertahanannya bermakna, bisnis komersialnya bisa lebih sensitif terhadap permintaan penerbangan, gangguan wilayah udara, dan pergerakan harga minyak.
10. Spirit AeroSystems (SPR)
Spirit AeroSystems tetap terkait erat dengan siklus produksi pesawat global sebagai pemasok aerostruktur utama.Hasil terbaru menunjukkan kerugian yang melebar meskipun penjualan lebih tinggi, mencerminkan kenaikan biaya produksi yang sedang berlangsung pada program pesawat utama. Tekanan ini telah membebani kepercayaan investor dalam prospek jangka pendek. Akuisisi yang direncanakan oleh Boeing pada akhirnya dapat membentuk kembali posisi perusahaan dalam rantai pasokan, tetapi risiko eksekusi dan stabilitas produksi tetap menjadi pusat bagaimana harga pasar saham.
Apa yang harus ditonton selanjutnya
Eskalasi vs de-eskalasi: Pergeseran ke arah diplomasi atau diskusi gencatan senjata dapat dengan cepat mengubah sentimen seputar stok pertahanan.
Minyak dan pengiriman: Lonjakan energi dapat memperketat kondisi keuangan dan menekan sektor siklus.
Anggaran dan penghargaan: Pergerakan harga terkadang dapat mendahului keputusan kontrak, dengan kejelasan tiba ketika penghargaan diselesaikan.
Kapasitas produksi: Perusahaan dengan rekam jejak produksi dan pengiriman yang terbukti sering menarik perhatian investor paling banyak.
Kendala rantai pasokan: Tanah langka, propulsi, dan elektronik tetap menjadi hambatan potensial yang dapat membatasi seberapa cepat skala produksi.
Lensa jangka panjang
Konflik Iran 2026 pertama dan terutama merupakan tragedi kemanusiaan. Untuk pasar, ini juga dapat mewakili pergeseran dalam bagaimana pengeluaran keamanan nasional diprioritaskan dalam kerangka fiskal. Jika pengeluaran pertahanan tetap meningkat selama beberapa tahun, perusahaan dengan kapasitas manufaktur yang dapat diskalakan dan tumpukan teknologi terintegrasi dapat menarik perhatian investor yang berkelanjutan. Konon, pasar bergerak dalam siklus. Tema struktural dapat bertahan, tetapi mereka juga dapat harga ulang dengan cepat ketika asumsi berubah. Tetap analitis dan sadar risiko tetap penting.
Referensi ke perusahaan, sektor, atau pergerakan pasar tertentu disediakan hanya untuk komentar pasar umum dan bukan merupakan rekomendasi, penawaran atau ajakan untuk membeli atau menjual produk keuangan apa pun. Reaksi pasar terhadap peristiwa geopolitik atau makroekonomi dapat bergejolak dan tidak dapat diprediksi, dan hasil mungkin berbeda secara material dari ekspektasi.
So FY24 earnings are now done and from what we can see the results have been on the whole slightly better than expected. The catch is the numbers that we've seen for early FY25 which suggested any momentum we had from 2024 may be gone. So here are 8 things that caught our attention from the earnings season just completed.
Resilient Economy and Earnings Performance Resilience surprises remain: The Australian economy has shown remarkable resilience despite higher inflation and overall global pessimism. The resilience was reflected in the ASX 300, which closed the reporting season with a net earnings beat of 3 percentage points - a solid beat of the Street's consensus. This beat was primarily driven by better-than-expected margins, indicating that companies are effectively managing cost pressures through flexes in wages, inventories and nonessential costs.
The small guy is falling by wayside: However, the reporting outside of the ASX 300 paints a completely different picture. Over 53 per cent of firms missed estimates, size cost efficiencies and other methods larger firms can take were unable to be matched by their smaller counterparts. The fall in the ex-ASX 300 stocks was probably missed by most as it represents a small fraction of the ASX.
But nonetheless it's important to highlight as it's likely that what was seen in FY24 in small cap stocks will probably spread up into the larger market. Season on season slowdown is gaining momentum Smaller Beats what also caught our attention is the three-percentage point beat of this earnings season is 4 percentage points less than the beat in February which saw a seven-percentage point upside. That trend has been like this now for three consecutive halves and it's probable it will continue into the first half of FY25.
The current outlook from the reporting season is a slowing cycle, reducing the likelihood of positive economic surprises and earnings upgrades. Dividend Trends Going Oprah - Dividend Surprises: Reporting season ended with dividend surprises that were more aligned with earnings surprises, with a modest DPS (Dividends Per Share) beat of 2 percentage points. This marked a significant improvement from the initial weeks of the reporting season when conservative payout strategies led to more dividend misses.
The stronger dividends toward the end of the season signal some confidence in the future outlook despite conservative guidance. However, firms that did have banked franking credits or capital in the bank from previous periods they went Oprah and handed out ‘special dividends’ like confetti. While this was met with shareholder glee, it does also suggest that firms cannot see opportunity to deploy this capital in the current conditions.
That reenforces the views from point 2. Winners and Losers - Performance Growth Stocks Outperform: Growth stocks emerged as the clear winners of the reporting season, with a net beat of 30 percentage points. This performance was driven by strong margin surprises and the best free cash flow (FCF) surprise among any group.
However, there was a slight miss on sales, which was more than offset by higher margins. Sectors like Technology and Health were key contributors to the outperformance of Growth stocks. Stand out performers were the likes of SQ2, HUB, and TPW.
Globally-exposed Cyclicals Underperform: Global Cyclicals were the most disappointing, led by falling margins and sales misses. The earnings misses were attributed to slowing global growth and the rising Australian Dollar. Despite these challenges, Global Cyclicals did follow the dividend trend surprised to the upside.
Contrarian view might be to consider Global Cyclicals with the possibility the AUD begins to fade on RBA rate cuts in 2025. Mixed Results in Other Sectors: Resources: Ended the season with an equal number of beats and misses. Margins were slightly better than expected, and there was a positive cash flow surprise for some companies.
However, the sector faced significant downgrades, with FY25 earnings now expected to fall by 3.2 per cent. Industrials: Delivered growth with a nine per cent upside in EPS increases, although slightly below expectations. Defensives drove most of this growth, insurers however such as QBE, SUN, and HLI were drags.
Banks: Banks received net upgrades for FY25 earnings due to delayed rate cuts and lower-than-expected bad debts. However, earnings are still forecasted to fall by around 3 per cent in FY25. Defensives: Had a challenging reporting season, with net misses on margins.
Several major defensive stocks missed expectations and faced downgrades for FY25, which led to negative share price reactions. Future Gazing - Guidance and Earnings Outlook Vigilant Guidance has caused downgrades: As expected, many companies used the reporting season to reset earnings expectations. About 40 per cent in fact provided forecasts below consensus expectations, which in turn led to earnings downgrades for FY25 from the Street.
This cautious approach reflects the uncertainty in the economic environment and the potential for slower growth ahead, which was reflected in the FY24 numbers. Flat Earnings Forecast for FY25: The initial expectation of approximately 10 per cent earnings growth for FY25 has completely evaporated to just 0.1 per cent growth (yes, you read that correctly). This revision includes adjustments for the treatment of CDIs like NEM, which reduced earnings by 2.8 percentage point, and negative revisions in response to weaker-than-expected results, guidance, and lower commodity prices.
Resources were particularly impacted, with a 7.7 percentage point downgrade, leading to a forecasted earnings decline of 2.8 percent for the sector. Gazing into FY26: Early projections for FY26 suggest a 1.3 percent decline in earnings, driven by the expected declines in Resources and Banks due to net interest margins and commodity prices. However, Industrials are currently projected to deliver a 10.4 percent EPS growth, would argue this seems optimistic given the slowing economic cycle.
The Consensus Downgrades to 2025 Earnings: The consensus for ASX 300 earnings in 2025 was downgraded by 3 per cent during the reporting season. This reflects a broad range of negative revisions, with 23 percent of stocks facing downgrades. Biggest losers were sectors like Energy, Media, Utilities, Mining, Health, and Capital Goods all saw significant consensus downgrades, with Media particularly facing downgrades as budgets are slashed in half.
Flip side Tech, Telecom, Banks, and Financial Services, saw aggregate earnings upgrades. Notably, 78 percent of the banking sector received upgrades, reflecting some resilience in this group. Cash Flow and Margin Surprises Positive Cash Flow: Operating cash flow was a positive surprise, with 2 percentage point increase for Industrial and Resource stocks reporting cash flow at least 10 per cent above expectations.
The main drivers of this cash flow surprise were lower-than-expected tax and interest costs, along with positive EBITDA margin surprises. Capex: There were slightly more companies with higher-than-expected capex, but the impact on overall Free Cash Flow (FCF) was modest. Significant positive FCF surprises were seen in companies like TLS, QAN, and BHP, while WES, CSL, and WOW had negative surprises.
Final nuts and bolts Seasonal Downgrade Patterns: The peak in downgrades typically occurs during the full-year reporting season, so the significant downgrades seen in August are not necessarily a negative signal for the market. As the year progresses, the pace of downgrades may slow, and there could be some positive guidance surprises during the 2024 AGM season. However, with a slowing economic cycle, the likelihood of positive surprises is lower compared to 2023.
Overall, the reporting season highlighted the resilience of the Australian economy and the challenges facing certain sectors. While Growth stocks outperformed, the outlook for FY25 remains cautious with flat earnings growth and sector-specific headwinds. Investors will need to navigate a mixed landscape with potential opportunities in contrarian plays like Global Cyclicals, but also be mindful of the broader economic uncertainties.
Pasar minyak memiliki kebiasaan terlihat tenang tepat sebelum berhenti diselesaikan. Itulah penyiapannya sekarang.
Lalu lintas melalui Selat Hormuz telah menurun tajam karena konflik di sekitar Iran semakin intensif, dan lebih banyak kapal menjadi gelap dengan mematikan AIS, atau Sistem Identifikasi Otomatis, sinyal yang biasanya menunjukkan ke mana kapal bergerak. Hormuz bukan hanya jalur pelayaran lainnya. Ini adalah salah satu titik henti energi terpenting di dunia, jadi ketika visibilitas mulai menghilang, risiko pasokan bergerak kembali ke pusat percakapan.
Mengapa ini penting sekarang
Ini penting karena beberapa alasan.
Langkah judul adalah satu hal. Implikasi pasar adalah hal lain. Minyak bukan hanya tentang berapa banyak barel yang ada, melainkan juga tentang apakah barel itu dapat bergerak, siapa yang bersedia mengasuransikan mereka, berapa lama pembeli siap menunggu dan berapa banyak risiko ekstra yang dirasakan pedagang untuk menentukan harga.
Saat ini, tiga hal bertabrakan sekaligus: pengiriman yang terganggu, diplomasi yang rapuh dan pasar yang sudah sangat condong ke satu arah. Kombinasi itu dapat membuat Brent bergerak lebih cepat daripada yang disarankan oleh fundamental saja.
Apa yang mendorong pergerakan
1 Visibilitas pasokan memburuk
Pengemudi pertama sederhana. Pasar bisa melihat lebih sedikit, dan itu cenderung membuatnya lebih gugup.
Transit melalui Hormuz telah turun tajam, sementara porsi lalu lintas yang terus meningkat melibatkan kapal-kapal yang tidak lagi menyiarkan sinyal pelacakan standar. Dalam bahasa Inggris sederhana, lebih sedikit kapal yang bergerak secara normal melalui koridor kritis, dan lebih banyak aktivitas menjadi lebih sulit untuk dilacak. Itu tidak secara otomatis berarti pasokan akan runtuh. Tapi itu berarti ketidakpastian meningkat.
2 Penyangga penyimpanan Iran mungkin terbatas
Penggerak kedua adalah kendala ekspor dan penyimpanan Iran.
Kapasitas penyimpanan darat diperkirakan sekitar 40 juta barel, dan pasar mengamati apa yang digambarkan oleh beberapa orang sebagai garis merah 16 hari. Itulah titik di mana gangguan ekspor yang berkepanjangan dapat mulai memaksa pemotongan produksi untuk menghindari kerusakan waduk. Untuk pembaca yang lebih baru, takeaway-nya mudah. Jika minyak tidak dapat meninggalkan penyimpanan cukup lama, masalahnya mungkin berhenti tentang ekspor yang tertunda dan mulai menjadi masalah pasokan yang sebenarnya.
3 Penentuan posisi bisa memperkuat gerakan
Penggerak ketiga adalah penentuan posisi, yang hanya singkatan pasar untuk bagaimana pedagang sudah diatur sebelum langkah berikutnya terjadi.
Dalam hal ini, posisi minyak mentah spekulatif terlihat sangat sepihak. Itu penting karena ketika pasar condong terlalu jauh ke satu arah, tidak perlu banyak untuk memicu penyesuaian yang tajam. Guncangan geopolitik baru dapat memaksa pedagang untuk bergerak cepat, dan begitu itu dimulai, harga bisa berjalan lebih keras daripada yang bisa dibenarkan oleh berita yang mendasarinya saja.
Market Education
Hormuz crisis: Understanding global oil risk
What happens when the world’s key energy chokepoint stops flowing? Dive deep into our full breakdown of oil shocks, supply deterioration, and the market ripple effects.
Kejutan minyak jarang tetap terkendali di pasar energi.
Harga minyak mentah yang lebih tinggi dapat mulai muncul dalam pengiriman, manufaktur, dan tagihan energi rumah tangga. Itu berarti ekspektasi inflasi dapat mulai merayap lebih tinggi lagi. Bank sentral sudah berusaha mengelola keseimbangan yang sulit antara inflasi yang lengket dan pertumbuhan yang lebih lembut, sehingga minyak yang lebih tinggi dapat membuat pekerjaan itu lebih sulit.
Dan ini bukan hanya cerita tentang produsen minyak yang mendapatkan tumpangan. Maskapai penerbangan, perusahaan transportasi, dan bisnis sensitif bahan bakar lainnya dapat berada di bawah tekanan dengan cepat ketika biaya energi meningkat. Pasar ekuitas yang lebih luas mungkin juga harus memikirkan kembali prospek kebijakan jika minyak yang lebih tinggi membuat inflasi lebih kuat dari yang diharapkan.
Efek riak jauh melampaui minyak
Ada juga sudut mata uang, dan itu kurang mudah daripada yang terlihat pertama kali.
Mata uang terkait komoditas seperti dolar Australia sering mendapat dukungan ketika harga bahan baku naik. Tetapi hubungan itu tidak otomatis. Jika minyak naik karena permintaan global membaik, itu bisa membantu. Jika naik karena risiko geopolitik melonjak, pasar dapat beralih ke mode risk-off sebagai gantinya, dan itu dapat membebani dolar Australia bahkan ketika harga komoditas naik.
Itulah yang membuat gerakan semacam ini lebih menarik daripada yang terlihat pada pandangan pertama. Reli minyak yang sama dapat mendukung satu bagian pasar sambil memberi tekanan pada yang lain.
Aset dan nama dalam bingkai
Minyak mentah Brent tetap menjadi bacaan paling jelas tentang risiko pasokan yang luas. Jika pedagang menginginkan ekspresi paling bersih dari berita utama, ini biasanya tempat mereka melihat terlebih dahulu.
ExxonMobil adalah salah satu nama yang lebih jelas dalam bingkai. Harga minyak yang lebih tinggi dapat mendukung realisasi harga jual dan momentum pendapatan jangka pendek, meskipun tidak pernah sesederhana minyak naik, stok naik. Biaya, bauran produksi, dan sentimen yang lebih luas masih penting.
BerikutnyaEnergi menambahkan lapisan lain. Cerita ini bukan hanya tentang bahan bakar fosil. Ketika keamanan energi menjadi perhatian yang lebih besar, kasus ketahanan listrik domestik, investasi grid dan pembangkit alternatif dapat menguat juga.
AUD/USD adalah pasar lain yang layak diperhatikan. Australia terkait erat dengan siklus komoditas, sehingga harga bahan baku yang lebih kuat terkadang dapat mendukung mata uang. Tetapi jika pasar bereaksi lebih terhadap ketakutan daripada pertumbuhan, angin belakang yang biasa itu mungkin tidak bertahan.
Untuk pembaca yang lebih baru, poin kuncinya adalah bahwa pergerakan minyak tidak menyebar melalui pasar dalam garis yang rapi dan dapat diprediksi. Mereka bergelombang ke luar secara tidak merata, membantu beberapa aset, menekan yang lain dan terkadang melakukan keduanya pada saat yang bersamaan.
Portfolio Strategy
6 markets to watch as TACO meets oil shock fears
With global trade dynamics shifting rapidly, understanding the "Trump Shock" and its impact on supply chains and currency pairs is vital. Explore how to position your portfolio for upcoming trade volatility.
Narasi yang kuat tidak sama dengan perdagangan satu arah.
Gencatan senjata dapat menstabilkan arus pengiriman lebih cepat dari yang diharapkan. OPEC+dapat mengimbangi beberapa keketatan dengan mengangkat produksi. Data permintaan dari China bisa mengecewakan, mengalihkan fokus kembali ke konsumsi yang lemah daripada pasokan yang terbatas. Dan jika premi geopolitik memudar, minyak bisa mundur lebih cepat daripada yang ditunjukkan oleh suasana saat ini.
Untuk pembaca yang lebih baru, takeaway-nya sederhana. Reli minyak bisa menjadi nyata tanpa permanen. Sebuah langkah dapat dibenarkan dalam jangka pendek oleh risiko gangguan, kemudian berbalik dengan cepat jika risiko tersebut mereda atau jika permintaan melunak.
Pasar tidak lagi menetapkan harga minyak secara terpisah. Ini adalah visibilitas harga, keamanan transportasi dan risiko gangguan pasokan tumpah ke inflasi, mata uang, dan sentimen risiko yang lebih luas.
Itulah mengapa Hormuz penting, bahkan bagi pembaca yang tidak pernah memperdagangkan satu barel minyak mentah sendiri.
Your next earnings setup starts here
Stay ahead of major beats, misses, and market surprises. Log in to your terminal, open a new account, or explore our dedicated earnings academy.
Kami telah menghabiskan tiga angsuran terakhir dari seri ini untuk memetakan pipa ekonomi 2026: bank-bank yang menambatkan ibukota, utilitas yang memasok elektron, dan pembuat chip membangun silikon. Saat musim pelaporan April memasuki babak terakhirnya, perhatian bergeser ke pintu depan.
Meta, Amazon, dan Apple duduk di titik di mana pembangunan AI bertemu konsumen dan bisnis sehari-hari.
Mengapa pengembalian investasi sekarang menjadi fokus
Kesenjangan yang sulit, kadang-kadang disebut “Dispersi Besar”, terbuka antara perusahaan yang memungkinkan AI dan perusahaan yang memonetisasinya. Meta dan Amazon berada di pusat siklus belanja modal (capex) besar-besaran, terhadap perkiraan pengeluaran di seluruh industri sekitar US $650 miliar hingga US $700 miliar pada tahun 2026.
Itulah sebabnya metrik pengembalian investasi (ROI) berada di depan pikiran.
Adalah Meta Penargetan iklan berbasis AI cukup kuat untuk membenarkan program pengeluarannya?
Adalah Amazon Layanan Web (AWS) mempercepat ulang cukup cepat untuk mendukung push silikon khusus?
Bisa Apel mempertahankan penilaian premiumnya dengan menunjukkan siklus iPhone 17 itu nyata, bahkan di pasar China yang lebih sulit?
Pada tahun 2026, pertanyaannya bukan lagi hanya siapa yang dapat membangun pusat data. Dialah yang dapat mengubah investasi tersebut menjadi keuntungan yang berkelanjutan dan margin tinggi. Dengan pasar energi yang lebih tenang setelah gencatan senjata baru-baru ini, penilaian teknologi memiliki ruang untuk bernafas. Sekarang pasar menginginkan bukti.
IMPORTANT: REPORTING SCHEDULES CAN CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. REPORTING DATES AND RELEASE TIMES ARE FROM COMPANY INVESTOR RELATIONS CALENDARS WHERE MARKED CONFIRMED; OTHERWISE THEY ARE GO MARKETS ESTIMATES. CONSENSUS EPS, REVENUE AND ANALYST-RANGE DATA ARE FROM THIRD-PARTY MARKET CONSENSUS SOURCES, AS OF 20 APRIL 2026 (AEST). COMPANY GUIDANCE, BACKLOG AND OPERATING METRICS ARE FROM THE LATEST COMPANY FILINGS OR RESULTS PRESENTATIONS UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. FIGURES AND SCHEDULES MAY CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.
$META| Q1 2026 REPORTING PERIOD
Meta Platforms, Inc.
NASDAQ | Technology/Advertising | 29 Apr 2026
✓ CONFIRMED
Global Release Countdown (AMC)
00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$6.69
Consensus Revenue
US$55.4bn
AUSTRALIA/ASIA30 Apr | 6:05 am
US/LATAM29 Apr | 4:05 pm
Market intelligence: $META
Analysis: Meta price drivers and scenarios
Ad click improvement (est.)
+3–5%
From AI-driven targeting
2026 capex estimate
~US$135bn
Market estimate range
Silicon strategy
MTIA 2nm
Broadcom co-development
Strategy note
What is MTIA 2nm? This is Meta's "home-grown" AI chip. The 2nm refers to ultra-advanced, high-efficiency technology. By building their own silicon with Broadcom, Meta aims to slash their massive electricity bills and end their total reliance on buying expensive NVIDIA hardware. If this works, it protects Meta's profit margins even if they keep spending billions on AI.
AVG
LOW US$6.30AVG US$6.69HIGH US$7.10
Meta has moved from its "Year of Efficiency" into what CEO Mark Zuckerberg calls the "Era of Personal Superintelligence". By April 2026, AI appears to have sharpened the company’s core advertising engine, with some reports suggesting ad click rates rose by around 3% to 5%. But the bigger strategic issue is Meta’s multi-year Broadcom partnership to co-develop custom 2nm MTIA chips, with the aim of reducing reliance on NVIDIA and lowering operating costs over time. The risk is that Meta could beat on earnings and still disappoint if management points to higher spending and a longer payoff period. The real question is whether efficiency gains are keeping pace with the capital expenditure (capex) bill.
Call focus and key signals
The Avocado AI model
Watch for ad click improvements tied to the "Avocado" AI model deployment, currently estimated to be lifting rates by up to 5%.
Signal: Monetisation efficiency
MTIA rollout status
Updates on the custom 2nm MTIA chip rollout with Broadcom will indicate Meta's long term cost structure flexibility.
Watch: Infrastructure independence
Reality Labs losses
Evidence of Reality Labs loss stabilisation would reduce the persistent drag on the overall earnings story.
Watch: Operating loss trend
Capex vs efficiency
The real question for investors is whether efficiency gains are keeping pace with the significant capex bill.
Signal: Spending productivity
Sentiment analysis: Meta Platforms
Interactive scenario analysis: $META
Select earnings outcome
Productive cycle
Spending cycle becomes productive
EPS above US$7.10, double-digit ad growth, and clear early efficiency gains from MTIA. The market may interpret that as a sign the spending cycle is becoming more productive rather than simply more expensive.
EPS level
Above US$7.10
Ad growth
Double digit
Efficiency
MTIA gains
Reaction
Strong rally
Sources & Data Methodology
Sources: Reporting dates and release times are from company investor relations calendars where marked Confirmed; otherwise they are GO Markets estimates. Consensus EPS, revenue and analyst-range data are sourced from Bloomberg and Earnings Whispers, as at 20 April 2026 (AEST). Company guidance, backlog and operating metrics are sourced from the latest company filings or results presentations. Any scenario analysis reflects GO Markets analysis. Figures and schedules may change without notice.
Expanded Coverage
Beyond the chipmakers
As the "show me the money" year unfolds, discover how AI demand is impacting Tesla, NextEra, and Exxon.
Amazon is no longer just a retail story. It is increasingly a cloud and advertising business, with a thin-margin logistics network attached. In 2026, the narrative is centred on what reports have described as a roughly US$200 billion capex plan, aimed largely at building out AWS’s AI infrastructure.
$AMZN| Q1 2026 REPORTING PERIOD
Amazon.com, Inc.
NASDAQ | Technology/Retail | 29 Apr 2026
✓ CONFIRMED
Global Release Countdown (AMC)
00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$1.69
Consensus Revenue
~US$177.7bn
AU/ASIA30 Apr | 6:00 am
US/LATAM29 Apr | 4:00 pm
Market Intelligence: $AMZN
Analysis: Amazon price drivers and scenarios
AWS growth threshold
20% YoY
Market floor expectation
2026 Capex plan (est.)
~US$200bn
Largely AWS AI infrastructure
Custom silicon
Trainium 3 and 4
In-house AI chip pipeline
AVG
LOW US$1.50AVG US$1.69HIGH US$1.90
Amazon is no longer primarily a retail story. In 2026, the narrative centres on approximately US$200 billion in planned capex, directed largely at building out AWS's AI infrastructure. That is an extraordinary commitment, and the market is watching closely to see whether the returns are following. One metric matters most: AWS growth.
Key signals to watch
AWS growth rate
Anything materially below 20% YoY could reinforce the bear case that spending is running well ahead of returns.
Watch: AWS growth vs 20% floor
Trainium supply commitments
Early supply commitments for Trainium 3 and 4 would signal how quickly the transition to in-house chips is progressing.
Watch: Trainium 3 and 4 progress
Retail margins under tariff pressure
Management commentary on whether Section 122 tariff costs are being absorbed or passed on is vital for the non-AWS story.
Watch: Retail operating margin
Advertising segment momentum
Sustained growth here provides a high-margin earnings cushion if retail margins are squeezed by logistics or tariffs.
Watch: Advertising revenue growth
Sentiment Analysis · Amazon.com Inc.
Interactive scenario analysis: $AMZN
Select earnings outcome
Investment Landing
Spending cycle lands well
EPS above US$1.90 and AWS growth above 24% with firmer retail margins. The market interprets this as proof the massive investment cycle is delivering efficient returns.
EPS Level
Above US$1.90
AWS Signal
Above 24%
Retail Margin
Firmer
Reaction
Positive rally
Sources & Data Methodology
Sources: Reporting dates and release times are from company investor relations calendars where marked Confirmed; otherwise they are GO Markets estimates. Consensus EPS, revenue and analyst-range data are sourced from Bloomberg and Earnings Whispers, as at 20 April 2026 (AEST). Company guidance, backlog and operating metrics are sourced from the latest company filings or results presentations. Any scenario analysis reflects GO Markets analysis. Figures and schedules may change without notice.
Apple: quality still needs proof
Apple has looked like the defensive favourite in hardware, helped by record free cash flow (FCF) of US$43.64 billion and the strength of its Services segment. But the latest debate is whether that defensive status can turn back into growth. Third-party shipment data has indicated a roughly 20% rise in China for iPhone 17, challenging the idea that the market is already mature.
$AAPL| Q2 FY2026 REPORTING PERIOD
Apple Inc.
NASDAQ | Consumer Technology | 30 Apr 2026
✓ CONFIRMED
Global Release Countdown (AMC)
00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$1.91
Consensus Revenue
~US$109.0bn
AU/ASIA01 May | 6:30 am
US/LATAM30 Apr | 4:30 pm
Market intelligence: $AAPL
Analysis: Apple price drivers and scenarios
Free cash flow (FCF)
US$43.6bn
Record, prior period
Services run-rate target
~US$30bn
Quarterly revenue approach
China iPhone 17 shipments
+~20%
Third-party data estimate
AVG
LOW US$1.70AVG US$1.91HIGH US$1.94
Apple is still widely seen as a quality print, but expectations are higher now. Margin resilience alone is no longer enough. The market wants evidence that Apple Intelligence, the company’s on-device AI platform, can extend the upgrade cycle and support more recurring, high-margin Services revenue over time.
Key signals to watch
iPhone 17 demand in China
China remains the most closely watched variable. Third-party data has pointed to growth of around 20%, but earnings will provide the first company-sourced data point.
Watch: China revenue growth
Services revenue trajectory
Services is approaching a US$30 billion quarterly run rate and carries structurally higher margins. Further acceleration reduces reliance on iPhone cycle volatility.
Watch: Services revenue vs US$30bn
Apple Intelligence rollout
On-device AI is a key upgrade catalyst. Management commentary on adoption, features and international timing will shape refresh cycle expectations.
Watch: Apple intelligence milestones
Gross margin
Apple guided to a 48% to 49% range. Holding near the top signals product mix strength. A result below 48% raises questions about cost pressure.
Watch: Gross margin vs 48% to 49%
Sentiment analysis: Apple Inc.
Interactive scenario analysis: $AAPL
Select report outcome
Growth support
Support for growth narrative
EPS above US$1.94, firmer China iPhone 17 data and gross margin above 49%. The market may interpret that as support for the higher-quality growth narrative and validate the thesis that Apple Intelligence is beginning to drive a meaningful upgrade cycle.
EPS level
Above US$1.94
China demand
Firmer
Gross margin
Above 49%
Reaction
Bullish move
Sources & Data Methodology
Sources: Reporting dates and release times are from company investor relations calendars where marked Confirmed; otherwise they are GO Markets estimates. Consensus EPS, revenue and analyst-range data are sourced from Bloomberg and Earnings Whispers, as at 20 April 2026 (AEST). Company guidance, backlog and operating metrics are sourced from the latest company filings or results presentations. Any scenario analysis reflects GO Markets analysis. Figures and schedules may change without notice.
Thematic risks
What could shift the picture
Three risks could change the narrative, regardless of how the numbers print.
1. Spending without visible returns
Meta and Amazon are both running enormous capex programmes, with payoff periods that stretch well beyond a single quarter. If either company delivers an in line or weaker result while also lifting full year spending guidance, the market may start to see the gap between investment and return as a structural issue rather than a temporary one. That would matter for the sector as a whole, not just for one stock.
2. China as a variable, not a constant
Apple's China story has shown some resilience in third party data, but it remains sensitive to trade policy, consumer confidence and local competition. Any signal from management that demand is softening faster than expected, or that local rivals are gaining meaningful share in the mid range and premium segments, could reset the earnings growth outlook more quickly than consensus currently assumes.
3. The K-shaped consumer backdrop
In a market where higher income consumers are holding up while lower income groups remain under pressure, ad spending patterns and device upgrade cycles can diverge sharply from headline averages. If Meta's ad pricing weakens because smaller businesses pull back, or if Apple's upgrade cycle is concentrated within a narrower demographic, results could disappoint even with broadly stable macro conditions.
Note: These thematic risks may influence sector wide risk appetite independently of headline EPS results.
The bottom line
The 2026 reality check
As this earnings season moves towards its close, the story is shifting away from survival and towards operational execution in the intelligence era.
$META
AI ad efficiency is facing its biggest test yet. Can the Broadcom silicon bet start to show up in margins?
$AMZN
AWS re-acceleration remains the critical signal. A US$200 billion capex push needs a growth rate to match.
$AAPL
Quality still needs proof. Apple Intelligence has to show it can extend the upgrade cycle, not just refresh it.
For Meta, Amazon and Apple, the test is whether heavy investment in silicon, models and infrastructure is turning into measurable cash flow and durable margins. In a more uneven economy, the market appears to be rewarding companies that can show real demand and clearer monetisation. The earnings numbers matter, but management commentary on the return on that investment may matter more.
Your next earnings setup starts here
Stay ahead of major beats, misses, and market surprises. Log in to your terminal, open a new account, or explore our dedicated earnings academy.
Musim pendapatan AS April mendarat di pasar yang menginginkan lebih dari sekadar cerita bagus. JP Morgan telah menetapkan standar tinggi dengan hasil yang kuat, dan perhatian sekarang beralih ke ruang mesin S&P 500: infrastruktur AI. Tiga perusahaan berada di pusat cerita itu.
Mengapa jendela penghasilan ini penting untuk AI
Microsoft, Alphabet dan NVIDIA bukan hanya peserta dalam siklus AI, mereka membangun arsitektur fisik dan perangkat lunak yang bergantung pada perusahaan lain: chip, wilayah cloud, model, dan alat. Jika pengeluaran ini akan memberikan pengembalian, tanda-tanda pertama mungkin mulai terlihat dalam hasil triwulanan mereka selama beberapa minggu ke depan.
Setiap perusahaan mewakili tes yang berbeda.
Microsoft: Apakah adopsi AI perusahaan diterjemahkan ke dalam ekspansi pendapatan dan margin
Alfabet: Apakah memiliki tumpukan penuh, dari chip ke cloud hingga distribusi, adalah keuntungan yang tahan lama atau hanya posisi yang mahal untuk dipertahankan
NVIDIA: Apakah siklus perangkat keras masih bertahan, dipercepat, atau mulai merata
Pada tahun 2026, pertanyaannya bukan lagi apakah investasi AI sedang terjadi, komitmen modal substansialnya dan sudah dinyatakan secara publik. Pertanyaannya adalah apakah pengeluaran itu menghasilkan pengembalian cukup cepat untuk membenarkan skala taruhan tersebut.
IMPORTANT: REPORTING SCHEDULES CAN CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. REPORTING DATES AND RELEASE TIMES ARE FROM COMPANY INVESTOR RELATIONS CALENDARS WHERE MARKED CONFIRMED; OTHERWISE THEY ARE GO MARKETS ESTIMATES. CONSENSUS EPS, REVENUE AND ANALYST-RANGE DATA ARE FROM THIRD-PARTY MARKET CONSENSUS SOURCES, AS OF 16 APRIL 2026 (AEST). COMPANY GUIDANCE, BACKLOG AND OPERATING METRICS ARE FROM THE LATEST COMPANY FILINGS OR RESULTS PRESENTATIONS UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. FIGURES AND SCHEDULES MAY CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.
$MSFT| Q1 2026 REPORTING PERIOD
Microsoft Corporation
NASDAQ | Technology | 29 Apr 2026
Confirmed
Global Release Countdown (AMC)
00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$4.04
Consensus Revenue
US$81.40bn
AU/ASIA30 Apr | 6:05 am
US/LATAM29 Apr | 4:05 pm
Market Intelligence: $MSFT
Analysis: Microsoft price drivers and scenarios
Azure Growth Target
37-38%
Constant currency projection
AI Contribution
+6-8 pts
Azure revenue from AI services
FY26 Capex
US$146bn
Total infrastructure spending
AVG
LOW US$3.86AVG US$4.04HIGH US$4.14
Microsoft is being tested on a specific question: can it turn heavy AI spending into margin expansion? A result above US$4.14 could ease concerns over "capex fatigue" and demonstrate whether Azure growth is re-accelerating alongside enterprise AI adoption.
Factors that could move the markets
Azure growth rate
Watch if constant-currency growth re-accelerates above 39%, suggesting AI workloads are filling new capacity rather than sitting idle.
Signal: Capacity Utilisation
Workplace agent adoption
The shift to autonomous agents is central. Clear enterprise uptake in Dynamics 365 supports the high-tier subscription thesis.
Signal: Software Monetisation
Maia 200 cost savings
If the in-house AI chip is lowering inference costs at production levels, gross margins may start to recover from recent compression.
Watch: Gross Margin Recovery
Regulatory backdrop
Ongoing scrutiny of cloud bundling practices remains a potential headwind; management commentary here is vital for the long-term view.
Watch: Bundling Compliance
Sentiment Analysis · Microsoft Corp.
Interactive scenario analysis: $MSFT
Select earnings outcome
AI Scaling Proof
Strong result, backed by real AI progress
EPS above US$4.14 and Azure re-acceleration above 39% could support the view that AI spending is starting to translate into commercial returns. Workplace Agents show measurable ROI and FY26 guidance is raised.
EPS Outcome
Above US$4.14
Cloud Signal
Accelerating
Guidance
Raised
Possible reaction
Strong rally
Sources & Data Methodology
Sources: Reporting dates and release times are from company investor relations calendars where marked Confirmed; otherwise they are GO Markets estimates. Consensus EPS, revenue and analyst-range data are sourced from Bloomberg and Earnings Whispers, as at 16 April 2026 (AEST). Company guidance, backlog and operating metrics are sourced from the latest company filings or results presentations. Any scenario analysis reflects GO Markets analysis. Figures and schedules may change without notice.
Expanded Coverage
Beyond the Chipmakers
As the "show me the money" year unfolds, discover how AI demand is impacting Tesla, NextEra, and Exxon.
Alphabet has transformed from a search business into a sprawling AI infrastructure play, and this result will test whether that transformation is delivering. The US$185 billion capex forecast for 2026 is extraordinary, close to double last year's spending. EPS is expected to decline slightly year on year, precisely because that infrastructure spending is consuming capital. The question is whether Google Cloud's growth is fast enough to show a credible path back to margin recovery, and whether Ironwood, the seventh-generation custom AI chip, is proving its cost-per-query advantage at scale.
$GOOGL| Q1 2026 REPORTING PERIOD
Alphabet Inc.
NASDAQ | Technology | 29 Apr 2026
Confirmed
Global Release Countdown (AMC)
00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$2.64
Consensus Revenue
US$92.14bn
AU/ASIA30 Apr | 6:30 am
US/LATAM29 Apr | 4:30 pm
Market Intelligence: $GOOGL
Analysis: Alphabet price drivers and scenarios
Cloud growth
48% YoY
Compared with last quarter
Ironwood TPU
10x peak
Vs previous-generation chip
2026 Capex
US$185bn
Double last year's spending
AVG
LOW US$2.50AVG US$2.64HIGH US$2.80
Alphabet has shifted to being viewed as a broader AI infrastructure play. The question is whether Cloud growth can support a path back to margin recovery while the massive US$185bn infrastructure buildout absorbs capital.
Factors that could move the markets
Google Cloud momentum
Markets are watching if the 48% growth rate holds, specifically among customers using Ironwood TPUs for large-scale AI.
Signal: Enterprise AI Adoption
Search & AI overview
If compute-intensive AI summaries are monetising through ads, it supports core search economics in the AI era.
Focus: Search Economics
Capex & margin trajectory
With free cash flow under pressure from US$185bn capex, markets want to know when infrastructure investment will moderate.
Watch: Spending Ceiling
DOJ antitrust risk
Management commentary on the legal timeline for Chrome or Android divestiture appeals will influence how risk is priced.
Watch: Regulatory Remedies
Sentiment Analysis · Alphabet Inc.
Interactive scenario analysis: $GOOGL
Select earnings outcome
Efficiency Proof
Ironwood efficiency drives upside
EPS above US$2.80 and cloud growth above 45% suggest Ironwood is cutting costs and strengthening Google’s advantage faster than expected.
EPS outcome
Above US$2.80
Cloud Signal
Strong growth
Waymo
Accelerating
Reaction
Sentiment improves
Sources & Data Methodology
Sources: Reporting dates and release times are from company investor relations calendars where marked Confirmed; otherwise they are GO Markets estimates. Consensus EPS, revenue and analyst-range data are sourced from Bloomberg and Earnings Whispers, as at 16 April 2026 (AEST). Company guidance, backlog and operating metrics are sourced from the latest company filings or results presentations. Any scenario analysis reflects GO Markets analysis. Figures and schedules may change without notice.
NVIDIA: the hardware cycle read through
NVIDIA is no longer simply a chip company. It has become what analysts now describe as the central bank of compute, the entity whose product determines how much AI capacity the world can actually deploy.
The upcoming Q1 FY2027 result will test whether the new Vera Rubin R100 GPU architecture, which entered mass production ahead of schedule, is already contributing to revenue, and whether NVIDIA can sustain gross margins above 75% as inference, rather than training, becomes the dominant workload. Inference is more competitive and more price-sensitive than training, so margin resilience here matters.
$NVDA| Q1 2026 REPORTING PERIOD
NVIDIA Corporation
NASDAQ | Semiconductors | 20 May 2026
Confirmed
Global Release Countdown (AMC)
00:00:00:00
Consensus EPS
US$1.70
Consensus Revenue
US$78.42bn
AU/ASIA21 May | 6:30 am
US/LATAM20 May | 4:30 pm
Market Intelligence: $NVDA
Analysis: NVIDIA price drivers and scenarios
Revenue growth
73% YoY
Last quarter benchmark
Data centre share
91%+
Share of total revenue
Rubin R100
In production
Mass production began April 2026
AVG
LOW US$76bnAVG US$78bnHIGH US$81bn+
NVIDIA’s outlook depends on whether Rubin R100 can keep gross margins above 75% as inference becomes a bigger part of demand. Because inference is more price-sensitive than training, margins are the key test.
Factors that could move the markets
Rubin ramp-up
Watch whether Rubin production can scale smoothly without disrupting the Blackwell transition.
Signal: supply chain continuity
Inference margins
The key test is whether NVIDIA can keep gross margins above 75% as inference revenue grows.
Signal: pricing power holds up
Sovereign AI demand
Government-backed investment in Europe and the Middle East could broaden the base beyond hyperscalers.
Signal: market expansion
CUDA regulatory risk
Any US or European scrutiny of NVIDIA’s software advantage could move the stock regardless of the revenue result.
Signal: software moat under review
Sentiment Analysis · NVIDIA Corp.
Interactive scenario analysis: $NVDA
Select earnings outcome
Rubin ramp supports growth
Rubin ramp supports growth
Revenue above US$81 billion may suggest the Rubin ramp is tracking ahead of expectations. That could support the view that AI demand is broadening into sovereign AI and enterprise markets, helping extend visibility into 2027.
Revenue Outcome
Above US$81bn
Gross Margin
Above 75%
Workload
Inference strong
Reaction
Positive read-through
Sources & Data Methodology
Sources: Reporting dates and release times are from company investor relations calendars where marked Confirmed; otherwise they are GO Markets estimates. Consensus EPS, revenue and analyst-range data are sourced from Bloomberg and Earnings Whispers, as at 16 April 2026 (AEST). Company guidance, backlog and operating metrics are sourced from the latest company filings or results presentations. Any scenario analysis reflects GO Markets analysis. Figures and schedules may change without notice.
Why this reporting window matters for the broader market
Microsoft and Alphabet report on the same evening, 29 April, making the overnight session into 30 April one of the most information-dense points of the year for equity markets. For Australian traders, both results should be available by 6:30 am AEST on Thursday 30 April. That means price reactions may already be visible in US futures before the ASX opens.
NVIDIA reports later, in May, but it casts a long shadow over everything in between. The guidance the company gave for Q1 FY2027, US$78 billion in revenue, has set a benchmark the market has been tracking for months. If Microsoft and Alphabet's results suggest AI infrastructure demand has softened, that could reset expectations heading into NVIDIA's call. If both beat expectations and signal accelerating cloud growth, that could lift the floor for what NVIDIA may report.
That interconnection is what makes this cluster different from most earnings windows. The results do not just affect the individual companies. They also signal the health of an investment supercycle that has driven global equity market leadership for the past two years.
What could shift the picture
Three risks could change the narrative regardless of how the numbers print. Each one is worth understanding before the results land.
1
Capex fatigue
If both Microsoft and Alphabet report in line or below expectations while reaffirming enormous spending plans, the market may start pricing the risk that AI monetisation is slower than the spending implies. That is not a stock-specific concern. It would be a broader de-rating event, affecting the valuations of companies across the technology sector that are priced on the assumption that AI returns are coming and coming soon.
2
Regulatory escalation
The FTC investigation into Microsoft, the DOJ case against Alphabet, and emerging EU scrutiny of NVIDIA's CUDA software ecosystem are all active. A material legal development before the earnings calls, whether a new filing, a remedy announcement or a court ruling, could overshadow the financial results entirely. Regulatory risk in this sector is not theoretical. It is live and moving.
3
Competition from custom silicon
Microsoft's Maia 200 chip, Alphabet's Ironwood TPU, Amazon's Trainium and Meta's custom accelerators are all reducing how much the large cloud companies depend on NVIDIA hardware. If any of these companies signals a meaningful shift in its GPU procurement plans during the earnings call, that could create uncertainty around NVIDIA's forward order book, even if its own Q1 FY2027 results beat expectations.
The 2026 Reality Check
$MSFT
AI spend is shifting from cost to competitive advantage. The question is whether margins can follow.
$GOOGL
Vertical integration from chips to search to cloud may prove to be a moat, or an expensive position to defend.
$NVDA
This is the pulse of the AI hardware cycle, and a test of whether Rubin can keep the supercycle alive into 2027.
Bottom Line
Microsoft and Alphabet report on the same evening, 29 April. NVIDIA follows in late May. Together, they may offer the clearest read yet on whether the AI infrastructure buildout is generating returns fast enough to justify the extraordinary scale of capital being committed. The earnings per share (EPS) number is important. What management says about AI monetisation timelines, capex trajectories and competitive positioning may matter more.
Your next earnings setup starts here
Stay ahead of major beats, misses, and market surprises. Log in to your terminal, open a new account, or explore our dedicated earnings academy.
